Focal Brain Lesions Pinpoint Common OCD Network and Treatment Targets

Unraveling Brain Circuitry in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) affects approximately 2% to 3% of the population, often presenting with severe, debilitating symptoms that can be resistant to conventional pharmacotherapy and cognitive-behavioral therapy [1, 2]. For these patients, neuromodulation techniques such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) and magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) are increasingly considered viable options, with studies demonstrating significant symptom reduction when targeting specific brain regions [3, 4, 5]. For instance, a systematic review of MRgFUS for psychiatric disorders reported a full responder rate of 67% (defined as a ≥35% reduction in Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale score) in OCD patients following bilateral anterior capsulotomy [3]. While neuroimaging has advanced our understanding of brain structure and function in OCD, revealing alterations in cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical circuits, the precise causal mechanisms and network-level dysfunction remain areas of active investigation [1, 6, 7]. Identifying common neural pathways across different presentations of OCD, including those that arise following focal brain lesions, could provide critical insights into the disorder's pathophysiology and guide the development of more precise, individualized treatment strategies [8, 9].

Mapping Lesion-Associated OCD Circuits

To investigate the neural underpinnings of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) that arises after brain injury, the researchers initiated their study by conducting a systematic literature search to identify cases of OCD associated with focal brain lesions. This meticulous approach allowed them to gather a specific cohort of patients where a direct link between a localized brain injury and the subsequent development of OCD symptoms could be established. The identified cases were then rigorously compared against a large reference group of control lesions (N=608), ensuring a robust statistical comparison to pinpoint lesion locations uniquely associated with OCD.

A critical component of the methodology involved analyzing the connectivity patterns associated with each lesion. The study computed connectivity with each lesion location using normative functional connectivity, a sophisticated statistical method. This technique establishes a baseline of typical brain wiring patterns and functional interactions by leveraging data from a large healthy population, in this instance, N=1000 individuals. By comparing the functional connectivity of lesion sites in OCD patients to this normative baseline, the researchers could precisely map how each lesion disrupted or altered typical brain network activity. This detailed analysis was instrumental in their primary objective: to identify a brain network specific to OCD lesions, thereby revealing common neural pathways implicated in the disorder's development following focal injury.

Key Brain Regions and Network Identification

From the initial systematic literature review, the researchers identified 129 cases of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) associated with focal brain lesions. Of these, 40 cases had clearly defined lesion locations, allowing for precise anatomical mapping and connectivity analysis. When comparing these OCD-associated lesions to the control lesions, distinct patterns emerged regarding their anatomical distribution. The study found that OCD-associated lesions intersected the orbitofrontal cortex significantly more often than control lesions. Similarly, the right temporal pole was also intersected more frequently by OCD-associated lesions compared to the control group, highlighting specific cortical areas implicated in the disorder's development following injury.

Beyond individual lesion locations, a crucial finding was that these OCD-associated lesions were linked to connectivity to a distinct brain network. This network identification moves beyond simply pinpointing damaged areas, instead revealing a common functional circuit whose disruption, whether by focal injury or other mechanisms, appears central to the manifestation of OCD symptoms. Understanding this specific network provides a more precise framework for comprehending the neural underpinnings of OCD, offering potential targets for diagnostic refinement and therapeutic interventions.

Connecting Lesional and Primary OCD Pathophysiology

To determine the broader clinical implications of their findings, the researchers explored the relevance of this identified network, derived from focal brain lesions, for primary obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). This step was crucial for bridging the understanding of lesion-induced OCD with the more common idiopathic form of the disorder. The analysis revealed a significant convergence: the distinct brain network identified from lesion-associated OCD cases overlapped with abnormal functional brain imaging findings in patients with primary OCD. This alignment suggests that the network disrupted by focal lesions mirrors the dysfunctional circuitry observed in patients without a clear lesion etiology, pointing to a shared pathophysiological mechanism.

Further emphasizing the clinical utility of this network, the study found that it also overlapped with effective brain stimulation targets in primary OCD. This direct correspondence between the lesion-derived network and established therapeutic sites, such as those used in deep brain stimulation, provides strong validation for the network's role in OCD symptomatology and treatment response. Ultimately, the study concluded that lesion locations associated with OCD map to a common brain network. This common network not only aligns with brain imaging abnormalities in patients with primary OCD but also aligns with brain stimulation outcomes in these patients, offering a unified framework for understanding OCD's neural basis and guiding future therapeutic strategies.

References

1. Bijanki K, Pathak Y, Najera RA, et al. Defining functional brain networks underlying obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) using treatment-induced neuroimaging changes: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2021. doi:10.1136/jnnp-2020-324478

2. Dowling NA, Cowlishaw S, Jackson AC, Merkouris S, Francis K, Christensen DR. Prevalence of psychiatric co-morbidity in treatment-seeking problem gamblers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 2015. doi:10.1177/0004867415575774

3. Henn MC, Smith HD, Ramos CGL, et al. A systematic review of focused ultrasound for psychiatric disorders: current applications, opportunities, and challenges.. Neurosurgical Focus. 2024. doi:10.3171/2024.6.FOCUS24278

4. Mavridis IN, Konstantakopoulos G. Complications of capsulotomy in the treatment of psychiatric illness: A systematic review.. 2025. doi:10.22365/jpsych.2025.017

5. Alonso P, Cuadras D, Gabriëls L, et al. Deep Brain Stimulation for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Meta-Analysis of Treatment Outcome and Predictors of Response. PLoS ONE. 2015. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0133591

6. Xiao J, Wu J. Effectiveness of the Neuroimaging Techniques in the Recognition of Psychiatric Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of RCTs.. Current medical imaging. 2023. doi:10.2174/1573405620666230526113304

7. Raduà J, Mataix‐Cols D. Voxel-wise meta-analysis of grey matter changes in obsessive–compulsive disorder. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 2009. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.108.055046

8. Cotovio G, Descalço N, Caballero-Insaurriaga J, et al. Dysfunctional brain circuits overlap in lesional and idiopathic obsessive-compulsive disorder.. Biological psychiatry. 2026. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2026.05.001

9. Cotovio G, Descalco N, Caballero-Insaurriaga J, et al. Obsessive-compulsive disorder secondary to focal brain lesions: from lesions to networks.. medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences. 2025. doi:10.1101/2025.01.09.25320060