For Doctors in a Hurry
- Clinicians require a single imaging modality to assess both anatomical and functional lung status in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.
- The study retrospectively analyzed 23 patients who underwent both photon-counting computed tomography and ventilation-perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography.
- Whole-lung perfusion measurements showed a strong correlation between the two imaging modalities with a Pearson coefficient of 0.72.
- The researchers concluded that photon-counting computed tomography provides high concordance with established single-photon emission computed tomography standards for perfusion assessment.
- This imaging technique may streamline diagnostic work-up by providing simultaneous high-resolution assessment of lung vasculature, parenchyma, and perfusion.
Streamlining the Diagnostic Pathway in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension
Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) remains a life-threatening complication of pulmonary embolism, characterized by organized thrombi and progressive microvascular remodeling [1]. While ventilation/perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (V/Q-SPECT) is the established first-line screening tool due to its high sensitivity for perfusion defects, it lacks the spatial resolution required for detailed surgical planning [2, 3]. Computed tomography angiography is frequently employed to visualize vascular anatomy, yet traditional energy-integrating detectors often struggle with image noise and limited spectral information [4, 5]. Recent international guidelines emphasize the need for standardized, high-quality imaging to guide complex interventions like pulmonary endarterectomy or balloon pulmonary angioplasty [6, 7]. A new study now evaluates whether photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT), a technology that uses direct-conversion detectors to count individual X-ray photons and measure their energy, can bridge the gap between functional perfusion mapping and high-resolution anatomical assessment in a single examination.
Comparing Modalities in a Clinical Cohort
The researchers conducted a retrospective single-centre study involving twenty-three patients to evaluate the diagnostic utility of photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT). The primary objective was to compare quantitative lobar lung perfusion between PCCT and ventilation/perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (V/Q-SPECT) in individuals with suspected or confirmed chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). This patient cohort consisted of ten females and thirteen males, with a mean age of 67.9 ± 10.7 years. By focusing on lobar-level data, which divides the lungs into their five primary anatomical sections, the study aimed to determine if the high-resolution capabilities of PCCT could provide functional perfusion information equivalent to the current clinical standard of scintigraphy (the use of radioactive tracers to visualize organ function).
Quantifying Perfusion with Advanced Imaging
The technical utility of photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) lies in its ability to provide a high-resolution assessment of perfusion, vasculature, and parenchyma in one scan, effectively merging anatomical and functional data into a single clinical examination. In this study, the researchers analyzed lung perfusion on a lobar basis by comparing PCCT-derived perfused blood volume (PBV) maps with traditional V/Q-SPECT perfusion images. These PBV maps utilize the spectral capabilities of photon-counting detectors to quantify iodine distribution within the lung tissue, serving as a high-resolution surrogate for regional blood supply. To ensure anatomical precision during this comparison, the researchers utilized TotalSegmentator (an automated, artificial intelligence-based tool for identifying anatomical boundaries) to perform lobar segmentation, which allowed for a standardized and reproducible definition of the lung volumes being measured. To facilitate a direct comparison between the different units of measurement used in CT and scintigraphy, the data were normalized using a z-score approach (a statistical method to standardize scores based on the distance from the mean) based on the 95% confidence interval. This normalization process was essential for aligning the relative intensity of the PCCT-derived iodine maps with the radioactive tracer counts from V/Q-SPECT. Following this standardization, perfusion defect volumes were quantified from normalized maps, providing a precise measurement of the areas where blood flow was restricted or absent. This quantification is clinically relevant as it directly reflects the extent of vascular obstruction and microvascular disease in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. The researchers employed Pearson correlation and Bland–Altman analyses to compare lobar and whole-lung perfusion metrics, assessing both the linear relationship and the absolute agreement between the two modalities. These statistical methods allowed the team to determine if the functional information provided by PCCT was consistent with the established clinical standard of nuclear medicine.
Strong Correlation Across Lobar and Whole-Lung Metrics
The quantitative analysis demonstrated that whole-lung perfusion correlated strongly between PCCT and V/Q-SPECT (r = 0.72, p < 0.05), suggesting that the newer CT technology provides a reliable assessment of global pulmonary blood flow. This relationship remained robust when the researchers examined the lungs at a more granular level, which is essential for identifying the regional distribution of disease in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Specifically, lobar correlations ranged from r = 0.62 to r = 0.85, indicating that PCCT-derived measurements are consistent with nuclear medicine standards across different anatomical segments. For the clinician, these high correlation coefficients suggest that the iodine maps generated by photon-counting detectors can accurately reflect the regional perfusion variations typically identified via scintigraphy. In terms of absolute quantification, the study found that PCCT yielded slightly higher perfusion values, with a mean perfused blood volume of 0.50 ± 0.04, compared to 0.49 ± 0.09 for V/Q-SPECT. To further assess the agreement between these two modalities, the researchers utilized a Bland–Altman analysis (a statistical method used to compare two different measurement techniques to see how much they differ). This analysis showed a minimal bias of +0.015 with limits of agreement ranging from −0.13 to +0.16, confirming that the two methods produce highly consistent results with very little systematic overestimation or underestimation by the CT-based approach. This level of agreement is clinically significant because it supports the use of PCCT as a quantitative tool rather than just a qualitative visual aid. The researchers also evaluated the extent of non-perfused tissue, which is a critical metric for surgical planning and assessing disease severity. The perfusion defect volumes correlated moderately for the whole lung (r = 0.60, p < 0.05), while the perfusion defect volumes for individual lobes correlated with r values between 0.49 and 0.77 (p < 0.05). These findings indicate that PCCT can effectively identify and quantify areas of restricted blood flow, matching the diagnostic performance of V/Q-SPECT while providing the added benefit of high-resolution anatomical imaging.
Clinical Implications for CTEPH Management
The high concordance between photon-counting computed tomography and ventilation/perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (V/Q-SPECT) suggests a potential shift in the diagnostic workflow for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Currently, V/Q-SPECT serves as the standard first-line imaging method for CTEPH, yet it is limited by a lack of anatomical detail, often requiring subsequent computed tomography angiography to visualize the pulmonary arteries and lung parenchyma. The study findings demonstrate that PCCT-based perfusion imaging shows high concordance with V/Q-SPECT, providing a reliable functional assessment while simultaneously offering the spatial resolution necessary to evaluate structural changes. By integrating these capabilities, PCCT enables simultaneous high-resolution assessment of perfusion, vasculature, and parenchyma in a single examination, which may reduce the need for multiple imaging appointments and decrease the time to definitive diagnosis. For the practicing clinician, the ability to obtain quantitative lobar perfusion data alongside detailed vascular imaging is particularly relevant for surgical and interventional planning. The researchers found that whole-lung perfusion correlated strongly between PCCT and V/Q-SPECT (r = 0.72, p < 0.05), and the minimal bias of +0.015 in Bland–Altman analysis indicates that the two modalities can be used interchangeably for assessing global and regional blood flow. This level of agreement supports the feasibility of using PCCT as a single-modality tool for both functional and anatomical lung evaluation. By providing a comprehensive view of the pulmonary environment, including the identification of organized thrombi and the quantification of perfusion defect volumes, PCCT may improve diagnostic confidence and streamline the clinical work-up for patients with suspected or confirmed CTEPH.
References
1. Hekimoğlu K, Gopalan D, Onur MR, Kahraman G, Akay T. Imaging in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: review of the current literature. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology. 2025. doi:10.4274/dir.2025.253249
2. Bajc M, Schümichen C, Grüning T, et al. EANM guideline for ventilation/perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism and beyond. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2019. doi:10.1007/s00259-019-04450-0
3. Malik M, Malik S, Karur GR, Mafeld S, Perrot MD, McInnis M. Cardiothoracic Imaging for Outcome Prediction in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension after Pulmonary Endarterectomy or Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty: A Scoping Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024. doi:10.3390/jcm13175045
4. Klok FA, Barco S, Bertoletti L, et al. Optimal Approach to Performing and Reporting Computed Tomography Angiography for Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Clinical Consensus Statement of the ESC Working Group on Pulmonary Circulation & Right Ventricular Function, the Fleischner Society, the Association for Acute Cardiovascular Care (ACVC) and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) of the ESC, Endorsed by European Respiratory Society (ERS), Asian Society of Thoracic Radiology (ASTR), European Society of Thoracic Imaging (ESTI), and Society of Thoracic Radiology (STR). Radiology. 2025. doi:10.1148/radiol.243833
5. Alış D, Önal MO, Orman M, et al. A scoping review of photon-counting detector computed tomography in cardiovascular imaging. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology. 2025. doi:10.4274/dir.2025.253597
6. Galiè N, Humbert M, Vachiéry J, et al. 2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension. European Respiratory Journal. 2015. doi:10.1183/13993003.01032-2015
7. Falster C, Hellfritzsch M, Gaist TA, et al. Comparison of international guideline recommendations for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. The Lancet Haematology. 2023. doi:10.1016/s2352-3026(23)00181-3