Polymer Sac Embolization Increases Aneurysm Regression After EVAR

Addressing the Durability Gap in Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is the primary intervention for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms because it offers a significant short-term survival advantage over open surgical repair [1, 2]. This early benefit often erodes over five years, as patients remain at risk for aneurysm-related mortality and late complications that are less common after open surgery [3, 4]. The necessity for lifelong surveillance stems from the risk of sac expansion and endoleaks, which can lead to late rupture if left unmanaged [5, 6]. While clinicians have investigated pre-emptive embolization of aortic side branches to prevent these issues, the optimal strategy for promoting aneurysm sac regression remains a subject of active clinical investigation [7]. A multicenter analysis now provides data on the use of a bioabsorbable polymer scaffold designed to facilitate sac remodeling during the initial endovascular procedure.

Bioabsorbable Scaffolding for Prophylactic Sac Management

The technology evaluated in this multicenter analysis involves the use of shape memory polymer plugs, which are porous, bioabsorbable polyurethane scaffolds designed to address the limitations of standard endovascular repair. Unlike inert metallic coils, these scaffolds are engineered to promote thrombosis and tissue ingrowth, a biological process where the patient's own cellular matrix forms within the polymer structure to stabilize and eventually obliterate the residual aneurysm space. By facilitating this active remodeling, the material aims to create a more durable seal within the excluded sac, potentially reducing the long-term risks of expansion and endoleak that necessitate frequent postoperative surveillance.

In the treatment arm of the study, clinicians performed prophylactic sac management by deploying these plugs into the aneurysm sac during the initial repair procedure. The researchers reported that a mean of 59 shape memory polymer plugs were implanted per patient to ensure adequate coverage of the vulnerable space. This intensive filling strategy resulted in a mean packing density of 129 percent, a metric representing the ratio of the expanded polymer volume to the calculated volume of the aneurysm sac. For practicing vascular surgeons, this high density of bioabsorbable material is intended to provide a robust framework for the subsequent thrombotic and fibrotic processes required for effective sac regression.

Comparing Real-World Outcomes and Standard Repair

The researchers conducted a global, multicenter real-world analysis of shape memory polymer use during endovascular aneurysm repair to evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic sac management. This retrospective, two-arm analysis utilized computed tomography angiography to compare outcomes in 97 highly selected patients who met rigorous prespecified eligibility criteria. The treatment group included 56 patients who underwent repair with shape memory polymer plugs between 2019 and 2023. This cohort represented a blend of clinical environments: 31 patients were treated prospectively as part of the AAA-SHAPE early feasibility studies, while 25 patients received the intervention in routine real-world practice.

To establish a robust comparison, the researchers identified a control group of 41 patients who underwent standard endovascular aneurysm repair at a single center between 2014 and 2019. Inclusion for the control arm required meeting identical clinical parameters used for the treatment group, including specific aneurysm size thresholds, sac volume parameters, and the use of infrarenal stent grafts within their instructions for use. Furthermore, all controls were required to have serial computed tomography angiography available for review and were excluded if they had undergone any adjunctive branch vessel embolization.

Baseline clinical characteristics revealed some differences between the two cohorts. Hypertension was significantly more prevalent in the control group than in the treatment group (98 percent vs 77 percent, p=.01). Conversely, the prevalence of prior myocardial infarction was lower in the control group, occurring in 0 percent of those patients compared to 17 percent of the treatment group (p=.01). Despite these variations in cardiovascular history, the study provided a controlled framework to assess how the addition of shape memory polymer plugs influences the physiological remodeling of the aneurysm sac over the first year of follow-up.

Significant Gains in Sac Remodeling and Clinical Stability

The primary clinical outcome of the multicenter analysis demonstrated that prophylactic sac management significantly enhances the physiological contraction of the aneurysm. Sac regression, defined as a volume reduction of more than 10 percent between 30-day and one-year imaging, occurred in 79 percent of the group receiving shape memory polymer plugs compared to 51 percent of the standard endovascular repair group (p<.01). To account for potential confounding variables, the researchers performed a multivariable analysis, which confirmed that treatment with shape memory polymer was independently associated with sac regression, carrying an odds ratio of 4.13 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.5 to 12.0; p<.01). For clinicians, this suggests that the mechanical presence of the bioabsorbable scaffold facilitates a more robust remodeling process than standard stent graft placement alone, potentially lowering the long-term risk of sac expansion.

Despite the significant improvement in sac shrinkage, the incidence of type II endoleak (retrograde flow into the aneurysm sac from branch vessels such as the lumbar or inferior mesenteric arteries) remained statistically similar between the two cohorts. Type II endoleaks were identified in 40 percent of the treatment group and 49 percent of the control group (p=0.4). This finding indicates that while the polymer plugs promote sac regression, they do not entirely eliminate the presence of retrograde flow within the first year. However, the clinical stability of both groups was high, as no aneurysm ruptures occurred in either the treatment or control arms during the follow-up period.

Safety and secondary intervention metrics further underscore the clinical parity between the two approaches in the short term. Secondary reintervention rates were 2.4 percent in the treatment group and 1.8 percent in the control group (p<.90), suggesting that the addition of the polymer plugs does not increase the immediate procedural burden or the need for corrective secondary procedures. Furthermore, one-year survival was 100 percent in the treatment group compared to 96 percent in the control group (p=.50). These data points collectively suggest that while the shape memory polymer plugs significantly improve the anatomical success of the repair through sac regression, they maintain a safety profile comparable to standard endovascular techniques.

Technical Determinants of Successful Embolization

To optimize the clinical application of shape memory polymer plugs, the researchers analyzed which technical factors most directly influenced the likelihood of aneurysm shrinkage. Within the treatment group, the spatial relationship between the implanted material and the internal anatomy of the aneurysm sac proved to be the most critical variable. A shorter plug distance to patent branch vessels was independently associated with sac regression, yielding an odds ratio of 0.54 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.30 to 0.71; p<.01). This finding suggests that the efficacy of the bioabsorbable scaffold is highly dependent on its proximity to the sources of potential retrograde flow, emphasizing the importance of precise plug placement near these branch orifices to facilitate effective sac remodeling.

In contrast, other procedural and anatomical metrics did not appear to dictate the success of the intervention. Packing density and thrombus burden (the amount of pre-existing clot within the aneurysm sac) were not independently associated with sac regression in the treatment group. These results indicate that the total volume of polymer material used and the baseline state of the aneurysm thrombus are less influential than the strategic positioning of the plugs. For the practicing vascular surgeon, these data suggest that achieving successful sac contraction depends less on the absolute quantity of the polymer implanted and more on the targeted embolization of areas adjacent to patent branch vessels.

References

1. Prinssen M, Verhoeven EL, Buth J, et al. A Randomized Trial Comparing Conventional and Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. New England Journal of Medicine. 2004. doi:10.1056/nejmoa042002

2. Cherian AM, Venu R, Raja PI, et al. Outcomes of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) Compared to Open Repair in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: An Umbrella Meta-Analysis.. Cureus. 2024. doi:10.7759/cureus.63183

3. Powell JT, Sweeting M, Ulug P, et al. Meta-analysis of individual-patient data from EVAR-1, DREAM, OVER and ACE trials comparing outcomes of endovascular or open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm over 5 years. British journal of surgery. 2017. doi:10.1002/bjs.10430

4. Stather P, Sidloff D, Dattani N, Choke E, Bown MJ, Sayers RD. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the early and late outcomes of open and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. British journal of surgery. 2013. doi:10.1002/bjs.9101

5. Papadoulas S, Pitros C, Tsimpoukis A, et al. Late post-EVAR abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture: a meta-analysis study.. Archives of medical sciences. Atherosclerotic diseases. 2024. doi:10.5114/amsad/190421

6. Khashram M, Hider PN, Williman JA, Jones GT, Roake JA. Does the diameter of abdominal aortic aneurysm influence late survival following abdominal aortic aneurysm repair? A systematic review and meta-analysis.. Vascular. 2016. doi:10.1177/1708538116650580

7. Yu HYH, Lindström D, Wanhainen A, Tegler G, Asciutto G, Mani K. An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of pre-emptive aortic side branch embolization to prevent type II endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2022.11.042