Preoperative Activity Linked to Lower Revision Risk but Higher Hardware Failure

Preoperative Activity and the Durability of Total Knee Arthroplasty

Total knee arthroplasty remains the definitive intervention for end-stage knee osteoarthritis, yet recovery is frequently hindered by persistent deficits in proprioception (the neurological process of sensing joint position and movement) and muscle weakness that can persist for up to 3 years postoperatively [1, 2, 3]. While clinicians utilize prehabilitation (preoperative exercise programs designed to optimize physical capacity), a meta-analysis of 17 studies found that while exercise-based programs improve pain at 6 months and function at 12 months, the overall clinical significance of these interventions remains contested [4, 5]. Long-term quality of life is further modulated by patient-specific variables, particularly increased body mass index and comorbid depression, which are among the most consistent predictors of suboptimal outcomes [6, 7]. Recent data suggest that maintaining physical activity levels until the time of surgery is vital, as patients who cease sports participation in the year prior to the procedure are unlikely to reinitiate these activities after recovery [8]. This retrospective cohort analysis investigates how these baseline activity levels specifically correlate with the long-term risk of mechanical failure and the necessity for revision surgery.

Cohort Selection and Propensity Score Matching

The researchers conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using a large national database to evaluate the long-term effects of preoperative physical activity on surgical outcomes. The study period for primary total knee arthroplasty inclusion spanned thirteen years, from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2023. To ensure a clear comparison, patients were stratified into active and inactive cohorts based on documented physical activity within the six months immediately preceding their surgery. This investigation specifically aimed to determine how these baseline activity levels influenced the risks of revision surgery and sepsis at one, two, and three years following the procedure. To minimize the influence of confounding variables, the authors employed propensity score matching (a statistical method used to reduce selection bias by equating groups based on baseline characteristics such as age, sex, and comorbidities). This process resulted in a final study population of 4,090 patients, divided into two balanced groups of 2,045 active patients and 2,045 inactive patients. By creating these matched cohorts, the researchers could more accurately isolate the impact of activity levels on a range of clinical outcomes, including revision surgery, hardware failure, hospital readmission, periprosthetic fracture, opioid abuse, and postoperative stiffness or limited range of motion.

Reduced Revision Risk and Early Recovery Trends

The analysis of the matched cohorts revealed that preoperative physical activity levels significantly influence the early surgical trajectory of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. To ensure statistical rigor, the researchers utilized risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals to evaluate outcomes, with the threshold for statistical significance defined as P < 0.05. This framework allowed for a precise assessment of how baseline activity levels correlated with postoperative complications and recovery milestones during the critical first year following the procedure. At the one-year postoperative mark, the data demonstrated a clear clinical advantage for the active cohort. Specifically, active patients had a lower risk of revision surgery (P = 0.047) compared to their inactive counterparts. This finding suggests that the physiological or behavioral characteristics of patients who maintain physical activity leading up to surgery may contribute to better primary implant stability or a reduction in the early complications that typically necessitate a return to the operating room. Furthermore, the study identified a nonsignificant trend toward reduced postoperative stiffness in active patients (P = 0.057) at one year. While this result did not meet the strict threshold for significance, it suggests a potential relationship between preoperative conditioning and improved postoperative range of motion that warrants further clinical attention.

The Long-Term Trade-off: Biological Success vs. Mechanical Fatigue

As the postoperative timeline extends into the second year, the data reveals a diverging clinical profile between the two cohorts. At two years postoperatively, preoperative activity was associated with a reduced risk of revision surgery (P = 0.008). This sustained reduction in revision risk suggests that the benefits of preoperative physical conditioning may extend well beyond the initial recovery phase, potentially through improved periarticular muscle strength or better integration of the prosthesis. However, this biological advantage is countered by a simultaneous increase in mechanical complications. The researchers found that at the same two-year mark, activity was also associated with an increased risk of hardware failure (P = 0.008). This statistical parity in P-values for both revision and hardware failure highlights a critical tension for clinicians: while active patients are less likely to require a full revision, they are significantly more susceptible to the mechanical fatigue of the implant components themselves. The longitudinal data at the three-year interval confirms that these trends represent a persistent shift in the risk profile for active individuals. At three years postoperatively, the lower revision risk persisted in active patients (P = 0.007), reinforcing the long-term protective effect of a physically active lifestyle prior to surgery. Despite this, the mechanical burden on the prosthesis remained elevated, as the higher hardware failure risk persisted in active patients (P = 0.026) at the three-year mark. For the practicing orthopedic surgeon, these findings necessitate a nuanced approach to preoperative counseling, as the increased mechanical demand active patients place on the joint appears to accelerate hardware failure.

Stability in Secondary Clinical Metrics

While preoperative activity levels significantly influenced the primary mechanical and revision outcomes, the researchers found that other critical postoperative complications remained unaffected by a patient's activity status. Throughout the three-year follow-up period, no significant differences were observed in hospital readmission rates between the active and inactive cohorts. This suggests that while active patients may experience different mechanical stresses on their implants, their overall risk for acute medical complications or surgical site issues requiring re-hospitalization does not deviate from the baseline established by their less active counterparts. The analysis further demonstrated that the increased mechanical demand associated with higher activity levels did not translate into a higher incidence of structural bone complications or behavioral health risks. Specifically, no significant differences were observed in periprosthetic fractures (fractures occurring around the components of the artificial joint) across all timepoints. This finding is particularly relevant for clinicians managing active patients, as it indicates that the increased risk of hardware failure previously noted does not necessarily extend to the integrity of the surrounding femoral or tibial bone. Furthermore, the study reported that no significant differences were observed in opioid abuse across all timepoints. This suggests that preoperative activity levels do not serve as a predictive marker for long-term dependency or misuse of analgesic medications following total knee arthroplasty. Consequently, while preoperative activity shapes the mechanical trajectory of the implant, it appears to have a neutral effect on the risk profile for readmission, periprosthetic fracture, and postoperative substance use disorders.

References

1. Daher M, Estephan M, Ghoul A, Tarchichi J, Mansour J. Hip Strengthening After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.. The archives of bone and joint surgery. 2024. doi:10.22038/ABJS.2024.76202.3520

2. Shetty S, Gudi N, S EAR, et al. Effect of total knee arthroplasty on quadriceps and hamstring muscle recovery in individuals with knee osteoarthritis: A proposed systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.. MethodsX. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.mex.2024.103057

3. Frattura GDL, Zaffagnini S, Filardo G, Romandini I, Fusco A, Candrian C. Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: Effects on Proprioception. A Systematic Review and Best Evidence Synthesis.. The Journal of arthroplasty. 2019. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2019.06.005

4. Wang L, Lee M, Zhang Z, Moodie J, Cheng D, Martin J. Does preoperative rehabilitation for patients planning to undergo joint replacement surgery improve outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open. 2016. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009857

5. Vervullens S, Meert L, Baert I, et al. Prehabilitation before total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review on the use and efficacy of stratified care.. Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine. 2023. doi:10.1016/j.rehab.2022.101705

6. Shetty S, Maiya GA, Kg MR, Vijayan S, George BM. Factors determinant of quality of life after total knee arthroplasty in knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review.. Journal of bodywork and movement therapies. 2024. doi:10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.08.013

7. Meert L, Mertens MG, Meeus M, et al. Identification of Metabolic Factors and Inflammatory Markers Predictive of Outcome after Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review.. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2023. doi:10.3390/ijerph20105796

8. Konings M, Vroey HD, Weygers I, Claeys K. Effect of knee arthroplasty on sports participation and activity levels: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine. 2020. doi:10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000729