Reduced Loss Aversion and Impaired Response Inhibition Distinguish Suicide Attempters

Cognitive Endophenotypes and the Clinical Challenge of Suicide Risk

Suicide remains a critical global health concern, and a previous suicide attempt currently stands as the only reliable predictor of future self-harm [1]. While the presence of mental disorders is a known risk factor, the transition from suicidal ideation to lethal action is often mediated by complex psychological drivers such as impulsivity, aggression, and intense mental pain [2, 3]. Neuroimaging has identified structural and functional brain alterations in depressed patients with suicidal histories, yet these findings often lack the granular specificity required for individual clinical risk stratification [4]. Clinicians frequently struggle to identify which patients are at the highest risk for reattempting suicide following hospital discharge, as standard interventions often fail to significantly reduce reattempt rates [5]. A recent study now investigates how specific decision-making mechanisms, including sensitivity to loss and reward processing, may differentiate subgroups of suicide attempters.

Comparative Assessment of Decision-Making and Inhibitory Control

To delineate the cognitive profiles associated with suicidal behavior, the researchers conducted a case-control study involving three distinct groups. The primary cohort consisted of 49 depressed patients with documented histories of both mood disorders and suicide attempts. To isolate cognitive markers specific to suicidality rather than general psychiatric distress, the authors compared these individuals to 34 patient controls who were diagnosed with mood disorders but had no personal history of suicide attempts. A third group of 49 healthy controls was recruited to establish a baseline for normative cognitive performance. This study design was preregistered at ClinicalTrial.gov under the identifier NCT05230043, ensuring methodological transparency and adherence to a predefined analytical plan. Participants completed a comprehensive battery of cognitive assessments designed to evaluate executive function and reward processing. These included the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), which measures value-based learning (the ability to adapt behavior based on the rewards or punishments received from previous choices) and the ability to weigh long-term consequences against immediate gains. The researchers also utilized a mixed gambling task to quantify sensitivity to potential gains and losses, as well as a Go/No-Go task to assess response inhibition, which is the cognitive ability to suppress a prepotent or impulsive motor response. By integrating these specific measures, the study aimed to identify whether impaired decision-making or a failure of inhibitory control serves as a more precise indicator of suicide risk in clinical settings.

Deficits in Response Inhibition and Value-Based Learning

The study results indicate that while general cognitive impairments are present across the spectrum of mood disorders, specific deficits in executive control distinguish those who have attempted suicide. On the Go/No-Go task, a measure of the ability to suppress a prepotent or inappropriate action, suicide attempters exhibited more total errors compared to both patient controls and healthy controls. This impairment was specifically driven by a higher frequency of commission errors, which occur when a patient fails to withhold a response to a non-target stimulus. These findings highlight significant deficits in response inhibition (the cognitive process of suppressing an impulsive motor action) among depressed suicide attempters, suggesting that a breakdown in the neurological braking system, often associated with the prefrontal cortex, may be a critical factor in the transition from suicidal ideation to action. Beyond inhibitory control, the researchers identified distinct patterns in how patients process rewards and consequences. Both patient groups (suicide attempters and patient controls) showed lower performance on the Iowa Gambling Task compared to the 49 healthy controls, indicating a general difficulty in value-based learning among individuals with mood disorders. However, the nature of this impairment differed between groups. While both depressed cohorts struggled to optimize their choices, the suicide attempters demonstrated a specific inability to integrate past losses into their decision-making process. This suggests that while depression itself may degrade the ability to learn from complex environments, the history of a suicide attempt is uniquely associated with a failure to inhibit impulsive responses and a reduced sensitivity to negative outcomes.

Loss Aversion as a Specific Marker for Suicidal Intent

The researchers identified a specific cognitive phenotype in the 49 depressed patients with a history of suicide attempts that was absent in the 34 patient controls. While both groups suffered from mood disorders, only the suicide attempters exhibited significantly lower loss aversion compared to the 49 healthy controls. Loss aversion refers to the psychological tendency to weigh potential losses more heavily than equivalent gains, a cognitive bias that typically serves as a protective mechanism during risky decision-making. In this study, the suicide attempters demonstrated a reduced sensitivity to these negative consequences, suggesting that their internal valuation system may undervalue the potential costs of self-harming actions. This finding is clinically significant because it suggests that a diminished sensitivity to loss, rather than just the presence of depressive symptoms, may be a key driver in the transition from suicidal ideation to an actual attempt. The study further clarified the relationship between these cognitive deficits and clinical severity through the Iowa Gambling Task, a psychological assessment used to simulate real-life decision-making under conditions of uncertainty and risk. The data revealed that poorer performance on the Iowa Gambling Task was associated with lower loss aversion, indicating that the inability to integrate potential negative outcomes into a choice strategy directly impairs overall decision-making quality. Crucially for the practicing clinician, the researchers found that poorer performance on the Iowa Gambling Task was also associated with higher levels of suicidal intent. This correlation suggests that the degree of impairment in value-based learning and loss processing may serve as a cognitive marker for the intensity of a patient's suicidal drive. By identifying these specific deficits, clinicians may better understand why certain patients remain at high risk despite standard therapy, as their underlying decision-making architecture remains biased toward risky or terminal choices.

Cognitive Profiles of Impulsive and Violent Subgroups

The researchers conducted a subgroup analysis to determine if specific cognitive signatures could differentiate between the clinical presentations of suicidal behavior. Among the 49 suicide attempters, those who made an impulsive suicide attempt demonstrated a distinct profile characterized by higher delay discounting compared to healthy controls. Delay discounting is the psychological tendency to prefer smaller immediate rewards over larger rewards that are delivered later, a trait that often manifests clinically as a lack of long-term planning and a focus on immediate relief from psychological pain. Furthermore, these impulsive attempters exhibited lower loss aversion rates than healthy controls, suggesting that the protective fear of negative consequences is significantly diminished in this specific patient population. Distinct cognitive patterns also emerged when the researchers categorized patients by the lethality of their methods. Attempters who chose violent means performed significantly worse in the first phase of the Iowa Gambling Task compared to those who used non-violent means. This initial phase of the task requires participants to navigate uncertainty and begin learning which choices lead to long-term gains, indicating that individuals who attempt suicide through violent means have a specific deficit in early-stage value-based learning. This subgroup also demonstrated lower loss aversion compared to both the 34 patient controls and the 49 healthy controls, marking a profound insensitivity to potential negative outcomes that distinguishes them from other depressed patients. These findings indicate that reduced sensitivity to losses and impaired value-based learning are central features of impulsive or violent suicidal acts. For the clinician, these data underscore the significant heterogeneity within the population of suicide attempters. Rather than viewing suicide risk as a monolithic construct, these results suggest that specific cognitive deficits, particularly a failure to properly weigh potential losses and a preference for immediate outcomes, may drive the most dangerous forms of suicidal behavior. Recognizing these individualized cognitive profiles may eventually allow for more precise risk stratification and the development of targeted interventions that address these specific decision-making impairments.

References

1. Nabinger AB, Panzenhagen AC, Dahmer T, et al. Early-life trauma, impulsivity and suicide attempt: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. Trends in psychiatry and psychotherapy. 2024. doi:10.47626/2237-6089-2023-0754

2. Gvion Y, Levi-Belz Y. Serious Suicide Attempts: Systematic Review of Psychological Risk Factors.. Frontiers in psychiatry. 2018. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00056

3. Too LS, Spittal MJ, Bugeja L, Reifels L, Butterworth P, Pirkis J. The association between mental disorders and suicide: A systematic review and meta-analysis of record linkage studies. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2019. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2019.08.054

4. Lin S, Chen Z, Zhao Y, Gong Q. Joint and distinct neural structure and function deficits in major depressive disorder with suicidality: a multimodal meta-analysis of MRI studies.. Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN. 2025. doi:10.1503/jpn.240112

5. García-Fernández A, Couce-Sánchez M, Andreo-Jover J, et al. Efficacy of a brief psychological intervention for adolescents with recent suicide attempt: A randomized clinical trial.. European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists. 2025. doi:10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.10065