- This study investigated whether white matter microstructure abnormalities in bipolar and psychotic disorders are present in unaffected first-degree relatives.
- Researchers conducted a meta-analysis of 11 samples, including 408 FDR-BD, 542 FDR-SZ, 841 controls, 255 BD, and 464 SZ participants.
- FDR-BD showed higher fractional anisotropy in the posterior limb of the internal capsule than controls, while FDR-SZ showed no differences.
- The authors concluded that white matter deficits observed in patients with bipolar or psychotic disorders are likely related to the illness itself, not familial risk.
- These findings suggest that white matter microstructure may not serve as a familial risk biomarker for these disorders in unaffected relatives.
Rethinking White Matter Changes in Psychotic and Bipolar Disorders
Schizophrenia and bipolar disorder are highly heritable conditions associated with significant disruptions in brain connectivity [1, 2]. Neuroimaging studies using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), a technique that maps the brain's white matter tracts, have consistently identified microstructural abnormalities in affected individuals, often measured as altered fractional anisotropy (FA), a marker of white matter integrity [3, 2, 4]. These changes are thought to underlie some of the cognitive and functional impairments seen in patients [5, 6]. While some studies have reported similar alterations in unaffected first-degree relatives, suggesting an inherited vulnerability [7, 8], the question of whether these brain changes are a true marker of familial risk or a consequence of the active disease process has remained unresolved. A large-scale meta-analysis now provides new data to help distinguish the effects of genetic risk from those of the illness itself [9].
Investigating Familial Risk and Disease Manifestation
The central question guiding this meta-analysis was whether the white matter abnormalities seen in patients with bipolar disorder (BD) and psychotic disorders (SZ) represent an inherited vulnerability or a manifestation of the active disease. To disentangle these factors, the researchers employed a powerful study design. They compared the white matter microstructure of unaffected first-degree relatives of individuals with BD (FDR-BD) and SZ (FDR-SZ) against healthy controls. This comparison allowed them to isolate brain characteristics associated with high genetic risk in the absence of confounding factors from active illness, such as medication effects or disease-related neurotoxicity. To provide a direct benchmark, the study also compared diagnosed BD and SZ patients from the same cohorts against controls, capturing the full effect of the disease. As a secondary aim, the authors explored how childhood trauma and working memory performance correlated with white matter structure across these groups, seeking to identify other potential modifiers of brain health.
A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Approach
To achieve the statistical power needed to detect subtle differences, the researchers conducted a large-scale meta-analysis, combining 11 distinct datasets from 9 institutions. This collaborative effort yielded a substantial cohort comprising 408 unaffected first-degree relatives of individuals with bipolar disorder (FDR-BD), 542 unaffected first-degree relatives of individuals with a psychotic disorder (FDR-SZ), and 841 control participants. For direct comparison, the analysis also included 255 patients with diagnosed bipolar disorder and 464 with a psychotic disorder. The investigators processed all diffusion-weighted imaging data using the standardized ENIGMA pipeline, a set of protocols that ensures results are comparable across different scanners and sites. The primary outcome was fractional anisotropy (FA), a key DTI metric where higher values typically indicate more organized and intact white matter tracts. Statistical analyses relied on linear mixed-effects models to compare groups while adjusting for age, sex, and the statistical dependence among family members. Finally, a random-effects meta-analysis was used to synthesize the findings, providing a robust overall estimate that accounts for variation between the individual study samples.
Key Findings: White Matter Integrity in Relatives and Patients
The analysis revealed a clear divergence in white matter patterns between unaffected relatives and diagnosed patients. Contrary to what might be expected from a simple genetic risk model, the study found that unaffected first-degree relatives of individuals with psychotic disorder (FDR-SZ) showed no significant differences in fractional anisotropy (FA) compared to controls. In the relatives of individuals with bipolar disorder (FDR-BD), the study identified a single, localized difference: higher FA in the posterior limb of the internal capsule (PLIC) compared to controls. The PLIC is a critical white matter pathway that carries motor and sensory information between the cerebral cortex, thalamus, and brainstem. This isolated finding in FDR-BD contrasts sharply with the widespread deficits seen in patients. Indeed, when analyzing the patient cohorts, the study confirmed that individuals with diagnosed BD or SZ exhibited the expected lower FA across several white matter tracts compared to controls. The exploratory analyses also noted that in FDR-SZ, higher working memory scores were more positively associated with FA in the PLIC than in controls, suggesting a potential difference in how this brain region supports cognition in at-risk individuals. The study found no association between childhood traumatic experiences and FA in any group.
Clinical Implications: Distinguishing Risk from Disease
These findings have direct clinical relevance for how physicians conceptualize the neurobiology of psychotic and bipolar disorders. The central conclusion is that the widespread white matter deficits commonly observed in patients with SZ and BD were not detected in their unaffected, high-risk first-degree relatives. The general absence of these abnormalities in relatives, who share on average 50% of their genes with the affected patient, strongly suggests that these microstructural changes are not a simple inherited trait or a static vulnerability marker. Instead, the data indicate that widespread white matter abnormalities are more likely a consequence or correlate of the active illness process itself. For clinicians, this reframes the interpretation of such neuroimaging findings. Rather than representing a pre-existing vulnerability, reduced fractional anisotropy may serve as a state marker, reflecting the impact of the disease on brain structure. This distinction is critical, suggesting that interventions aimed at preventing or mitigating these white matter changes could be most relevant after disease onset and may represent a target for therapies designed to limit the neuroprogressive aspects of these conditions.
References
1. Jameei H, Rakesh D, Zalesky A, et al. Linking Polygenic Risk of Schizophrenia to Variation in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Brain Measures: A Comprehensive Systematic Review.. Schizophrenia bulletin. 2024. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbad087
2. Zhao G, Lau WKW, Wang C, et al. A Comparative Multimodal Meta-analysis of Anisotropy and Volume Abnormalities in White Matter in People Suffering From Bipolar Disorder or Schizophrenia.. Schizophrenia bulletin. 2022. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbab093
3. Tamnes CK, Agartz I. White Matter Microstructure in Early-Onset Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review of Diffusion Tensor Imaging Studies.. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2016. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2016.01.004
4. Bihan DL, Mangin J, Poupon C, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging: Concepts and applications. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2001. doi:10.1002/jmri.1076
5. Verim B, Demirlek C, Zorlu N, et al. Transdiagnostic investigation of white matter integrity and cortical thickness in cognitive subgroups within the schizophrenia-bipolar spectrum.. Psychiatry research. 2026. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2026.116964
6. Gool RV, Cay M, Heijden HVD, et al. Neural and Behavioral Markers of Negative Symptoms and Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Psychosis.. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2025. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0039-25.2025
7. Xu M, Zhang W, Hochwalt P, et al. Structural connectivity associated with familial risk for mental illness: A meta-analysis of diffusion tensor imaging studies in relatives of patients with severe mental disorders.. Human brain mapping. 2022. doi:10.1002/hbm.25827
8. Fullerton JM, Klauser P, Lenroot RK, et al. Differential effect of disease-associated ST8SIA2 haplotype on cerebral white matter diffusion properties in schizophrenia and healthy controls.. Translational psychiatry. 2018. doi:10.1038/s41398-017-0052-z
9. Barendse MEA, Poortman SR, Ching CRK, et al. White matter microstructure in relatives of people with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder: an ENIGMA meta-analysis.. Molecular psychiatry. 2026. doi:10.1038/s41380-026-03628-x